The Tearline Method
In classified reporting, the tearline is the dividing line on the page: above it, the detail that could identify a source; below it, the substance that can be shared. Everything a reader needs sits below the line. Everything that could compromise the person who provided it stays above.
The Tearline Method applies that discipline to commercial intelligence. Source protection is not a promise appended to a report – it is the architecture of the work. Everything client-facing sits below the tearline: evidence-tagged, independently supportable, and defensible under scrutiny, without exposing the people who made it possible.
Operating principles
Three principles govern every engagement.
Six stages, two gates
-
1
Tasking Gate one
What is asked, what decision it serves, and whether the work should be taken at all. Conflicts checked, questions fixed, scope agreed.
-
2
Collection
The full documentary and public record: registries, filings, litigation, sanctions and media across English, Arabic and Amharic – read editorially, not keyword-matched.
-
3
Enquiry
Discreet human-source work where commissioned, planned approach by approach under absolute source-protection protocols.
-
4
Corroboration
Every claim independently stood up or held as unproven. Contradictions preserved, not reconciled.
-
5
Grading
Structured grading of every source and every item of information, separating reliability from plausibility. Findings are graded, not asserted.
-
6
Tearline Gate two
The report is cut: everything client-facing sits below the line – evidence-tagged, defensible, source-protected. Nothing leaves until it meets the standard.
The method underpins every service the practice offers – and it is the reason findings developed for a boardroom can survive contact with a courtroom.